“Cloning is
the process of making an exact copy of someone or something” (WHAT IS CLONING?). Since the
February 1997 announcement of the birth of Dolly, a sheep cloned by Ian Wilmut,
cloning research has increased greatly (science
museum). Cloning humans has recently become much more of a possibility than it was years ago (Batra).
Scientists are on the edge of a huge breakthrough in the field of human
cloning, and society must ask itself whether or not it should be allowed. Many
arguments can be made for and against human cloning, but since it is inhumane
and would take away individuality and social values. The practice of cloning
humans is one that government should ban and we should not accept.
Proponents
of human cloning may argue that it is just a logical and inevitable advance in science
research and technology. It is, however, too risky for human subjects. "At the
present time, the general consensus of the public is against human cloning" (science museum).
Within a few years' time, however, the medical possibilities of human cloning
may be attractive enough to change public opinion. Research on human cloning
would involve huge risks for the initial clones, because any experiments in
human cloning would eventually have to be carried out on human beings.
Human
cloning is unethical because the risks of this practice greatly outweigh the
benefits. The technique that produced Dolly the sheep was successful in only 1
of 277 attempts (science museum). If this
technique were attempted in humans, it would risk miscarriages in the mother
and severe developmental problems in the child. Standard medical practice would
never allow the use of any drug or device with such little study and without much
additional animal research (National Bioethics Advisory Commission). The actual
risks of physical harm to the cloned child cannot be certain without conducting
experiments on human beings. This in itself is unethical because no one knows
what will happen and the child is in danger because one does not know what is
going to happen, and are possibly leading to a child who could be disabled and
have developmental difficulties.
Human
cloning would violate a person's individuality and take away a child's
identity. Cloned children would see themselves not as a person, but as an
object that their parents could discard because of imperfection. A family is no
longer a genuine family.
Children
should be valued for who they are, not according to how closely they meet their
parents' expectations. If a child were cloned, his life would already have been
lived by another human being. Suppose a boy is cloned from a grandparent. The
cloned child knows too much about himself because another person in the world
is exactly like him. It is unfair for the earlier "twin" to determine
the child's life in this way. Imagine a world in which cloning is permitted and
practiced. Human cloning poses a huge risk to society and nature. It is
unethical and unacceptable, inappropriate and intolerable. Society should not
reduce itself to cloning of humans for its own benefit. Cloning would produce
many more problems than improvements. The course of life should be left up to
nature, the way it has been since the beginning of time.
Bibliography
Batra, Karen. "Process of Cloning." 2008. clonesafety.org.
17 April 2012 <http://www.clonesafety.com/cloning/facts/process/>.
"science museum." 27 April 2012
<http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/antenna/dolly/121.asp>.
"WHAT IS CLONING?" 2012. Learn.Genetics. 17 April 2012
<http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/tech/cloning/whatiscloning/>.